I enjoy seeing innovative logo designs. I enjoy trying to figure out the thought process that led to a particularly ingenious logo.
Conversely, I also enjoy seeing logo designs that are so clearly phoned in that the concept of someone being paid for the creation of said logo seems laughable. Like this one for Spa Chakra, an upscale spa located in New York, San Francisco, Chicago, and Marina Del Rey. To those not versed in the art of Illustrator, it probably seems pretty cool and complicated and somewhat appropriate to the business for which it was created. To those who work primarily in Illustrator, you will instantly recognize it as an instance of drawing a shape and hitting it with the Twirl tool. This process takes roughly 5 seconds.
Here’s my first try at replicating it. Not a match, but also next to no time spent in creating something that looks complicated, but isn’t.
If a graphic designer submitted this as a logo and was paid what logos should go for, one has to wonder if the designer found a legitimately simple solution to the design brief or if they presented their design as something special, unique, and complicated, which it isn’t.
This is not to condemn the designer; the client doesn’t pay for the time spent designing, but rather for the designer’s education and experience. That said, I would personally not be comfortable presenting a design like this one because I feel like a paying client deserves more effort.
What do you think? Is this a case of a designer being lazy? Or were they being lazy like a fox?













